Wonder why MY origami is valuable?

Posted March 26, 2009
Filed under: Ideas, Note |

Simple… labor leads to love. As explained it is the IKEA effect. :)

So true. Of course I price all the origami’s I make no less to any expert’s. That explains why have I been preserving everything I and my friend made. Though it is obvious alright.

It is overpowering to see people perceiving such extraordinary ideas. A friend pointed out these Harvard’s Breakthrough Ideas. Today did I read them. And to you, thanks it was a good read.

Off topic, what is it with me and coincidences? Too many c0-occurrences lately.  It rings so crazy. Yesterday I was toying with the idea of buying furniture. Very soon I have to move out of my present residence and am still indecisive about taking up a furnished or unfurnished apartment. It is really good that you buy the furniture in parts rather the whole assembled thing from IKEA. Mainly it is easier to transport.

But there is a whole different consumer-behavior-perception to it.

WOW! I wrote this post in 7 mins. Partly beacuse I have to run home and partly I am keeping someone waiting. :P

4 comments so far

  1. Njan on March 26, 2009

    .

  2. CM-Chap on March 27, 2009

    Ah I nvr know you stole all the Origami’s your friend made.. And call them as yours. Tht’s really bad. Anyways :)

    A friend pointed out these Harvard’s Breakthrough Ideas.hanks it was a good read – Romba Nandri. You could have explicity told the Thanks :)

    am still indecisive about taking up a furnished or unfurnished apartment – Im done with it yesterday. Signed the lease for a furnished place

    partly I am keeping someone waiting – I know him :-)

  3. Njan on March 27, 2009

    @Chap…

    You expected credits from her!?? And didn’t get it?

    Welcome to the real world! :) :)

    When some people are nice, they are reaally nice. When nasty… reeeaaaaalllllly nasty.! ;)

  4. Rajyalakshmi Mahalingam on April 27, 2009

    ~CM-Chap
    partly I am keeping someone waiting – I know him
    Why should it only be a *he*?

    ~Njan
    Thanks a ton!! Am I equally explicit?


Leave a reply